top of page

REPUBLICANS MUST END
CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS'S ABILITY AND ANY FUTURE CHIEF JUSTICE'S ABILITY OF EVER TAKING EXECUTIVE CONTROL OF THE US JUDICIAL CONFERENCE AND
THE JUDICIAL CONDUCT ACT AND
RULES ENACTMENT ACT
AGAIN!

THESE ARE OUR  LAWS TO
PROTECT US AND OUR CONSTITUTION FROM 
ORGANIZED FEDERAL JUDICAL

NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND!

"To understand how far Roberts's delusional thinking has gone all you need to do is look at the US Supreme Court's June 24, 2024 decision claiming that the federal judges have ANY authority or right to take over the people's democratic power and federal government's regulatory and executive power over the issues presented in â€‹UNITED STATES V. SKRMETTI. Why do I said that? Because you there none. Nothing. Nada. Roberts did it because Roberts feels like it that way. Period. This is our nation's greatest problem."

​​

Manuel P. Asensio

Asensio for St. Johns State Committeeman

June 24, 2024

​

UNITED STATES V. SKRMETTI​

"Asensio's view that the US v. Skrmetti case is not 'truthfully' about the Constitution, but 'really about Biden's  exploitation politics and the medical industry's pecuniary interest in puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and sex-transition surgeries.' Moreover, Asensio says the case is 'really about Chief Justice Roberts's misconduct at the US Judicial Conference to unconstitutionally expand the court's subject matter and the Constitution.'  

​

In my opinion, Asensio's view that US v. Skrmetti is a jurisdictional matter has merit and is clear and convincing."

​​

Anonymous Constitutional Law Expert

roberts.webp
Jeffrey sutton.jpeg
skrmetti.jpeg

 Tennessee Senate Bill 1 (SBl), prohibits all medical treatments allowed for a minor to identify with, or live as, a purported identity inconsistent with the minor's sex or to treat purported discomfort or distress from a discordance between the minor's sex and asserted identity,

​

UNITED STATES V. SKRMETTI,

June 24, 2024

“The unsettled, developing, in truth still experimental, nature of treatments in this area surely permits more than one policy approach, and the Constitution does not favor one over the other.”

​

​

Chief Judge Jeffrey Sutton

 The Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

 

​

​

​

“Tennessee, like many other States, acted to ensure that minors do not receive these treatments until they can fully understand the lifelong consequences or until the science is developed to the point that Tennessee might take a different view of their efficacy." 

 

Attorney General

Jonathan Skrmetti for Tennessee wrote in his brief defending state law. â€‹â€‹

​

Meanwhile the Leftist and Fascist in American Government, led by Obama their self-proclaimed constitutional law expert, is plodding to blame Trump for the events of January 6th  

​

Here is a look at one of Obama's Fabricated Constitutional Ideas:

​

“The U.S. Department of Justice — including the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, an appointed U.S. special counsel and the solicitor general, all of whom were involved in different ways in the criminal prosecutions underlying these cases and are opposing Mr. Trump’s constitutional and statutory claims — can petition the other seven justices to require Justices Alito and Thomas to recuse themselves not as a matter of grace but as a matter of law.”

​

"How to Force Justices Alito and Thomas to Recuse Themselves in the Jan. 6 Cases."

 

US Congressman Jamie Raskin

Lead Impeachment Manager

January 6th Hearings

Democratic Maryland 8th District 

 May 29, 2024

bottom of page